Web
analytics software can enable a business to slice and dice numerous web data
metrics and dimensions so they can analyze it, and interpret it to increase
sales, identify a new market segment, test website performance, optimize the user
experience, or determine promotion or event success. Monitoring your web insights will guide you and
your business to make continual decisions based on facts and not hunches to maximize
your marketing ROI.
There are numerous analytics software
programs available, but in an effort to keep it simple I will compare two popular
choices; Google Analytics Premium and Adobe Analytics (formerly Site Catalyst).
Each platform has its advantages so I have outlined the pros and cons for each,
so you can determine if either program aligns with your business and the
resources you have to run them.
When you are looking for a web analytics
solution, here are a few things to consider:
- What is their pricing structure?
- How many page views per month can the solution track?
- Do I have the resources to implement and run it?
- Can you reanalyze data if you decide to change something?
- Can you reanalyze subsets of your logs for more focused views?
- Can you accomplish your goals with free web analytics?
- What types of data collection options are available?
- Can you integrate with other sources of data?
- What level of support can I expect?
Price
The basic Google Analytics program is
free; however, it only allows you up to 10 million hits per month. Google Analytics Premium offers a number of
enhancements and more customization and will process up to 1 billion hits per
month for an annual flat fee of $150,000 (Google
Analytics, 2014).
Adobe Analytics cost varies according
to traffic volume and the service level and needs of your company and has no
monthly hit limit (Adobe,
2014). You have to call for a quote.
Usability
and Implementation:
Google Premium is by far more user-friendly and is
intended to be accessible and intuitive for the many. It is easily implemented on your website and
requires no special IT or programming skills. Google Analytics does offer
implementation for custom variables and most recently includes custom
dimensions and metrics and cost uploads for paid campaigns (Google Analytics, 2014).
Adobe Analytics, on the other hand, is the polar
opposite. Adobe’s analytics platform is intended for professionals and thrives
on providing depth along with completely customizable experiences, both of
which require training to understand anything beyond basic metrics (Chianis,
2013). Adobe demands the skills of a
professional to implement the upfront work and maintain highly customized data
reports that can be tailored to the needs of the business, which may considered
more valuable.
Functionality:
Adobe Analytics is a true web analytics
tool with data capability that runs broad and deep. While the interface is less
than intuitive, the quality of data and reporting presentation is high. You can
configure custom reports and export large data sets easily into multiple
formats through the job scheduling service.
Because the program is so customizable, there is a large degree of
flexibility and extensive advanced functionality for conversions, referrals,
path analysis and segmentation (Chainis,
2013). Features like Adwords is integrated through Search Center, granular
segmentations is accessed through Discover, A/B testing is implemented through
Test & Target, raw data access is through Data Warehouse, meaning, they are
not automatically integrated into the program.
Adobe Analytics also allows you to track visitors at the IP address
level and have unlimited user levels. On the flipside, it takes a high level of
effort to implement and maintain Adobe Analytics, there are limitations to
multi-session paths to conversion and attribution modeling and you have to pay
for training and support.
Google Analytics Premium is
user-friendly and intuitive program that provides a lot of the already integrated
marketing analytics tools like Adwords, Google Display Network and Media Attribution.
Premium is easily manipulated and will
give you a maximum of 50 custom variables (Google Analytics, 2014), however,
Adobe Analytics provides 250 custom variables, 75 traffic variables, 100 event
variables and 75 conversion variables, which can be set to capture whatever
you’d like (Adobe Analytics, 2014). What you don’t get with Premium is a really
granular drill down into the data and access to the raw data. Premium is incorporating
multi-device tracking while Adobe Analytics already has that capability, but it
is cumbersome to setup (McClendon,
E. 2013). While Adobe Analytics has
robust report capability, Premium has customized data visualization, intuitive
reporting and default variables making reporting simple.
Training
and Support:
Google Analytics has an online Help Center
and easy-to-follow online tutorials in the Analytics Academy to
gain a better understanding of Google Analytics and data analysis. Google Analytics Premium provides access to
an expert in account management for implementation and training as a part of
the annual fee.
Adobe Analytics offers online tutorials
and fee-based onsite user training support.
They also offer account management support as a part of their service.
This
or that?
To sum it up, Adobe Analytics is
complex and requires a technical user, which may require costly outside
consultative resources to implement and maintain on top of the annual fee. Since
it is so powerful and requires specialized responsibility, it can create a
bottleneck in the data process since fewer people have the ability to use
it.
While Premium has a flat fee, Adobe’s
pricing model depends on traffic and service level making budgeting and cost
more of a risk. It is loved in the
agency world, because it ties into Adobe’s Marketing Suite, Test & Target,
Digital Pulse and Search Center saving time and money (Singh,
2013).
To weigh your options, you must
consider how much incoming traffic your site receives and what type of reports can
be produced. Monthly hits max out at one billion for
Premium. For
medium to large businesses that require an enterprise system to
track a plethora of events, goals and variables and has the technical resources
in place to implement the custom reports and maintain it’s complexity Adobe
Analytics may be the appropriate choice.
Bottom line. Premium is nimble,
intuitive and user-friendly. Adobe
Analytics is powerful, data heavy and highly customizable. To decide, you must look at your business
today and select the tool that will allow you to grow with technology in
today’s landscape of multi-devices.
Words
of Caution
The caveat for most analytics solutions
is that if a visitor has JavaScript or cookies disabled there is limited data
gathering functionality. Cookies allow
you to track returning visitors; JavaScript lets you capture multiple variables
about a visitor and the browser they are using.
Without cookies and JavaScript enabled, you will only have limited
reporting capabilities (Lee,
n.d.).
Can companies actually change their marketing or market strategy based on the analytic feedback, or just use the information to track the "unknown element" of unique profiles viewing their site? I understand the ability to track WHERE companies advertise, but can it really be used to determine HOW they advertise?
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely. Analytics monitoring has robust features like goals and conversion funnels where you are able to track more than the basics of how long someone has visited your site, how many pages they viewed and bounce rate, rather, they came to our site, clicked on a product, added it to the shopping cart, abandoned it, but later came back to check out and conversion complete. Demographically, you can view your visitors by location, age, language. You may discover you have an untapped international market you can penetrate.
DeleteSo if Google Analytics Premium only allows up to 1 billion hits per month, do you think they make an exception for Google which I'm sure gets more than that? ;)
ReplyDeleteIronic question if I understand it correctly. I think Big Brother Google is looking at as much data as they like in their little empire while staying within their fuzzy, small print T's and C's.
ReplyDelete